Citizens Com. to Complete the Refuge v. Super. Ct. CA1/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 31, 2013A137634California3,064 words

Opinion

Opinion

Jenkins, J.

Filed 7/31/13 Citizens Com. to Complete the Refuge v. Super. Ct. CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

CITIZENS COMMITTEE TO

COMPLETE THE REFUGE,

Petitioner, v. A137634

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ALAMEDA

COUNTY, (Alameda County Super. Ct. No. RG10-530015) Respondent; CITY OF NEWARK et al., Real Parties in Interest.

In an ongoing mandamus action pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.),1 petitioner Citizens Committee to Complete the Refuge (hereafter Citizens) challenges the certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) and approvals of a specific plan project by real parties in interest…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.