Anderson
Anderson v. Runge
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES P. ANDERSON, No. 23-1535 D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00922-TLT Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
KEVIN RUNGE; L. RICHARDSON; D.
ARVIZO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Trina L. Thompson, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 17, 2025**
Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner James P. Anderson appeals pro se from the district
court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging retaliation and
due process violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). de novo. Nunez v. Duncan, 591 F.3d 1217, 1222 (9th Cir. 2010). We…