Ignacio

Ignacio v. Dudek

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202523-2872California380 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TEVIS ROBERT IGNACIO, on behalf of No. 23-2872 all (et al), D.C. No. 3:23-cv-00864-HZ Plaintiff - Appellant,

MEMORANDUM*

v.

LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Marco A. Hernández, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 17, 2025**

Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Tevis Robert Ignacio appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action relating to Social Security retirement benefits. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.