Bondi

Gomez De Castro v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202524-853California478 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSA GOMEZ DE CASTRO; DILICIA No. 24-853 CASTRO GOMEZ; JOSE CASTRO Agency Nos.

GOMEZ; SANTOS BRENDA CASTRO A220-502-453

GOMEZ; KEVIN ADONAY ORELLANA A220-502-449

CASTRO,

A220-502-450

A220-502-451

Petitioners, A220-502-452 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 13, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: N.R. SMITH and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Dana L. Christensen, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. Rosa Elena Gomez de Castro and her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.