Attia

Attia v. Oura Ring, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202524-2622California523 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Doctor PETER ATTIA, No. 24-2622 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:23-cv-03433-HSG v.

MEMORANDUM*

OURA RING, INC.; OURA HEALTH,

LTD.,

Defendants - Appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Haywood S. Gilliam Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted February 13, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: N.R. SMITH and JOHNSTONE, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.**

Defendant-Appellant Ouraring, Inc.,1 a United States-based subsidiary of the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Dana L. Christensen, United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation. 1 The correct name of the Delaware corporation named in this lawsuit as “Oura Ring, Inc.” is Ouraring, Inc. Finnish health technology company Oura (collectively, “Oura”), appeals the denial

of its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.