Vega

United States v. Vega

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202524-2300California331 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2300 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 4:14-cr-00484-PJH-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MANUEL VEGA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 17, 2025**

Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Manuel Vega appeals from the district court’s judgement and challenges the

24-month statutory maximum sentence imposed upon the fifth revocation of his

supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Vega contends that his sentence exceeds the maximum allowable sentence

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). because, together with the sentences he received for his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.