Rivera-Anaya
United States v. Rivera-Anaya
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3994 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:20-cr-01609-MSB-1 v.
MEMORANDUM*
DANIEL RIVERA-ANAYA,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Michael S. Berg, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 17, 2025
Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Daniel Rivera-Anaya appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying
his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291. Reviewing de novo, United States v. Riedl, 496 F.3d 1003, 1005 (9th Cir.
2007), we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In his petition, Rivera-Anaya argued that his attorney was ineffective for
failing to mail him…