Perales

United States v. Perales

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202524-2394California324 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-2394 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 1:17-cr-00245-DCN-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

RAY PERALES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho David C. Nye, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 17, 2025**

Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Ray Perales appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his motion

for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A). We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

As a preliminary matter, the government contends Perales’s notice of appeal

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). was untimely. Rather than remand for the district court to determine whether

Perales is correct that he has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.