Ibarra-Ozuna

United States v. Ibarra-Ozuna

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202524-3913California221 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-3913 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 2:18-cr-00076-DLR-1 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MARTIN IBARRA-OZUNA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 17, 2025**

Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Martin Ibarra-Ozuna appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the supervised release conditions imposed on remand for resentencing.

Ibarra-Ozuna’s counsel filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967), stating that there are no non-frivolous arguments for appeal. Appellant

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our independent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.