Seidler
Seidler v. amazon.com, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202524-1489California403 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KATHRYN MARIE SEIDLER, No. 24-1489 D.C. No. 2:23-cv-00816-JLR Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
AMAZON.COM, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington James L. Robart, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 17, 2025**
Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
Kathryn Marie Seidler appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing her employment action alleging various federal and state law claims.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Seidler’s motion to
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). stay proceedings because Seidler failed to…