Nguyen

Nguyen v. United States

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202524-2221California343 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MAI-TRANG THI NGUYEN, No. 24-2221 D.C. No. 5:23-cv-06047-VKD Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Virginia Kay DeMarchi, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted March 17, 2025***

Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Mai-Trang Thi Nguyen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging First Amendment claims arising

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). from the United States’ support for Israel’s military actions in Gaza. We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.