Morrow
Morrow v. Genius Fund
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202524-2306California351 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDREA MORROW, No. 24-2306 D.C. No. 3:24-cv-00039-SB Plaintiff - Appellant,
v. MEMORANDUM*
GENIUS FUND; LIAM
PALMIERI; CHRIS FINELLI; ARI
STIEGLER; FEDERAL BUREAU OF
INVESTIGATION; LINKEDIN
CORPORATION; USA TODAY; TAMI
ABDOLLAH; JOHN DOES, 1-
Inclusive,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 17, 2025**
Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Morrow’s request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. Andrea Morrow appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
her action alleging federal and state…