Morrow

Morrow v. Genius Fund

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202524-2306California351 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANDREA MORROW, No. 24-2306 D.C. No. 3:24-cv-00039-SB Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

GENIUS FUND; LIAM

PALMIERI; CHRIS FINELLI; ARI

STIEGLER; FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATION; LINKEDIN

CORPORATION; USA TODAY; TAMI

ABDOLLAH; JOHN DOES, 1-

Inclusive,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Michael H. Simon, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 17, 2025**

Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Morrow’s request for oral argument, set forth in the opening brief, is denied. Andrea Morrow appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

her action alleging federal and state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.