Uriostegui-Manjarrez

Uriostegui-Manjarrez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202524-5621California348 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOSE LUIS URIOSTEGUI-MANJARREZ, No. 24-5621 Agency No. Petitioner, A099-542-264 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of an Immigration Judge

Submitted March 17, 2025**

Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Jose Luis Uriostegui-Manjarrez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro

se for review of an immigration judge’s order affirming an asylum officer’s

negative reasonable fear determination. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s reasonable fear

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). determination. Orozco Lopez v. Garland, 11 F.4th 764, 774 (9th Cir. 2021). We

deny the petition for review.

Substantial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.