Ortiz

United States v. Ortiz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 21, 202524-4885California403 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 21 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 24-4885 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 3:24-cr-00068-AGS-2 v.

MEMORANDUM*

JOSE ANTONIO ORTIZ, Jr.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Andrew George Schopler, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 17, 2025**

Before: CANBY, R. NELSON, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Jose Antonio Ortiz, Jr., appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 92-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for

conspiracy to distribute methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1)

and 846. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Ortiz first contends that the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.