Jackson v. Super. Ct.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 21, 2025D084751MCalifornia6,921 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 3/21/25 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ELIJAH JACKSON, D084751

Petitioner, (San Diego County Super. Ct. No. SCD300281) v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF AND DENYING REHEARING

SAN DIEGO COUNTY,

NO CHANGE IN THE

Respondent; JUDGMENT

THE PEOPLE,

Real Party in Interest.

THE COURT:

It is ordered that the opinion filed on February 28, 2025, be modified as follows: On page 12, delete the paragraph beginning with “In addition,” and replace with the following: In addition, Jackson claims that the traffic stop and search of the car he was driving were the product of implicit racial bias. If the instant writ is resolved in Jackson’s favor and we remand the matter back to the trial court to reconsider Jackson’s motion, Jackson could ask the superior court to, “in the interest of justice, dismiss enhancements . . . or reduce one or more charges.” (§ 745, subd. (e)(1)(C).) In the alternative, Jackson could make an argument that the gun should be suppressed. (§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.