People v. Hendrix CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 21, 2025C100116California1,663 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mesiwala, J.

Filed 3/21/25 P. v. Hendrix CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo) ----

THE PEOPLE, C100116

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. Nos. CR20153634 & CR20161094) v.

STEVEN HENDRIX,

Defendant and Appellant.

The trial court resentenced defendant Steven Hendrix pursuant to Penal Code section 1172.75,1 reducing his prison sentence by five years. On appeal, defendant contends the trial court erred by imposing an upper term sentence for his gross vehicular manslaughter conviction. The People contend the trial court complied with section 1172.75 in imposing the upper term sentence. We do not resolve this dispute because defendant failed to object to the upper term sentence and has therefore forfeited the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.