Epidemic Sound, AB v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 EPIDEMIC SOUND, AB, Case No. 22-cv-04223-JSC
Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DISCOVERY DISPUTE
JOINT LETTER ABOUT EPIDEMIC’S
v. MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT
EFFORTS
META PLATFORMS, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 250, 251 Defendant.
12 Pending before the Court is a discovery dispute joint letter regarding Epidemic’s 13 monitoring and enforcement efforts. (Dkt. No. 250.) After carefully considering the parties’ 14 submissions, the Court concludes oral argument is not required, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), 15 and rules as set forth below.
I. 30(B)(6) WITNESS
17 Meta’s motion to compel a 30(b)(6) deposition on “Epidemic’s policies, practices, and 18 procedures for monitoring use of the Works on digital platforms other than Meta’s Services” is 19 GRANTED in part. Epidemic shall produce a witness to testify as to Epidemic’s monitoring of 20 YouTube and TikTok. This testimony is relevant to Epidemic’s claim that it was impossible for 21 Epidemic to demand take down of infringing works. …