Ramsey
Ramsey v. Thompson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL C. RAMSEY, Case No.: 23-cv-1920-JAH-DDL
12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL JOHN DOE #1, Warden, and N.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
THOMPSON, CDCR – CSR
Auditor, [Dkt. No. 39] Defendants.
Plaintiff Daniel C. Ramsey is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is a filing titled “Objection Motion to Defendants’ Motion for Partial Dismissal and Motion for Attorney.” Dkt. No. 39. The Court construes Plaintiff’s filing as a motion for leave to file an amended complaint, and for the appointment of counsel. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff’s request for counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.1 / / / 26 27 This Order disposes of Plaintiff’s request for counsel. Plaintiff’s motion for 28 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed…