United States v. Pablo Yaxon-Sicajau

Good Law
535 F. App'x 600
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 1, 201311-50362California244 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Pablo Cesar Yaxon-Sicajau appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 48-month sentence for conspiracy to con ceal and harbor illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 (a)(1)(A)(v)(I). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Yax-on-Sicajau’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Yaxon-Sica-jau the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Yaxon-Sicajau waived the right to appeal his conviction, with the exception of an appeal based on a claim that his plea was involuntary. He also waived the right to appeal most aspects of his sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief as to Yaxon-Sieajau’s plea or any aspects of the sentence not covered by the appeal waiver. We therefore affirm as to those issues. We dismiss the remainder of the appeal in light of the valid appeal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.