Myers
Myers v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 AMELIA MYERS, et al., Case No. 24-cv-02668-AMO Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
v. COURT-AUTHORIZED NOTICE GILEAD SCIENCES, INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 22 Defendants. 11 12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs Amelia Myers and Fatoumata Barry Yapo’s motion for court- authorized notice to the collective. ECF 22. This Order assumes familiarity with the facts and procedural history of the case. Plaintiffs’ motion is fully briefed and was heard before this Court on February 6, 2025. Having read the papers filed by the parties and carefully considered the arguments therein and those made at the hearing, as well as the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion, subject to the modifications discussed herein. I. DISCUSSION Plaintiffs argue they meet the lenient standard for conditional certification and that the Court should authorize notice to the collective. Defendants argue conditional certification is improper because…