Khurana

Khurana v. Clear Recon Corp

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20254:24-cv-01741California3,314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ANITA KHURANA, et al., Case No. 4:24-cv-01741-KAW

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT

v. CENLAR FSB'S MOTION TO DISMISS

CLEAR RECON CORP, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 21 Defendants.

12 On April 4, 2024, Defendant Cenlar FSB field a motion to dismiss. Thereafter, the parties engaged in significant mediation, which included the submission of a loan modification application. On November 4, 2024, the parties informed the Court that the case did not settle. Upon review of the moving papers, the Court finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), and, for the reasons set forth below, GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND On or around September 27, 2001, Plaintiffs purchased a single-family home, located at 1114 S Chanterella Dr. San Ramon, CA 94582, and have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.