Brown

Brown v. Camp Pendleton & Quantico Housing, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20253:23-cv-00567California9,562 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAINT BROWN, et al., Case No.: 3:23-cv-00567-JES-DDL

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. REMAND

CAMP PENDLETON & QUANTICO HOUSING, LLC, et al., [ECF No. 62] 16 Defendants. 17 18 19

21 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Saint Brown (“Brown”), Christine Brown, and Minor 22 Plaintiffs B.B., T.B., L.B., and C.B. (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) motion to remand for lack 23 of jurisdiction. ECF No. 62-2. Defendants filed an opposition and Plaintiffs filed a reply. 24 ECF Nos. 63, 65. On December 18, 2024, the Court heard oral argument on the matter and 25 ordered supplemental briefing. ECF No. 67. On January 3, 2025, Plaintiffs filed 26 supplemental briefing supporting their motion to remand. ECF No. 68. On January 17, 27 28 2025, Defendants filed an opposition to the supplemental briefing. ECF No. 69. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs’ motion to remand. I. BACKGROUND On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.