Ledwidge
Ledwidge v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NIALL LEDWIDGE, et al., Case No. 5:24-cv-08352-BLF
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE [Re: Dkt. No. 25] CORPORATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is Defendants Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Martin J. Gruenberg’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to stay discovery pending the resolution of their motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 25 (“Mot.”). Plaintiffs Niall Ledwidge, Michael Pearson, and Andrew Childe (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 32 (“Opp.”). Defendants filed a reply in support of their motion. Dkt. No. 33 (“Reply”). The Court finds this motion suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for May 22, 2025. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed this action on…