Ledwidge

Ledwidge v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20255:24-cv-08352California2,642 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 NIALL LEDWIDGE, et al., Case No. 5:24-cv-08352-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE [Re: Dkt. No. 25] CORPORATION, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is Defendants Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Martin J. Gruenberg’s (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to stay discovery pending the resolution of their motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 25 (“Mot.”). Plaintiffs Niall Ledwidge, Michael Pearson, and Andrew Childe (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) oppose the motion. Dkt. No. 32 (“Opp.”). Defendants filed a reply in support of their motion. Dkt. No. 33 (“Reply”). The Court finds this motion suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for May 22, 2025. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs filed this action on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.