Jane Roe AB 51 v. Doe 1

] 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 ? JANE ROE AB 51, Case No. 2:24-cv-03488-DJC-CSK Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED ll STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER D (ECF No. 34) DOE 1, A CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. 14 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 34), and 16 || finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court's Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The 17 || Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following clarification. The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 19 || jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 29 || 141 .1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 (E.D. 91 |} Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain jurisdiction for 97 || disputes concerning…