(HC) Glass v. People of the State of CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20252:24-cv-02811California3,574 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND GEORGE GLASS, No. 2:24-cv-2811 DC CSK P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. On July 8, 2024, petitioner filed a document styled “Original Writ of Peremptory Mandate and Memorandum of Points and Authorities Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 702, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, Rule 8, and ‘F.R.C.P. § 1361,’” and invoked Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 1 at 1.) This action was referred to this Court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). As set forth below, the Court recommends that this action be dismissed with prejudice.1 I. REQUESTS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS Civil actions are assessed filing fees of $350.00 plus a $55.00 administrative fee. See

This action was docketed as a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner objects that it is not a petition for writ of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.