Michael Harrison v. Bloom Floral Design

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 8:25-cv-00359-MEMF-ADS MICHAEL HARRISON,

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

STATE LAW CLAIMS BLOOM FLORAL DESIGN, a business entity; BLOOM SO CAL, a business entity; HARBER

ENTERPRISES LLC, a limited liability company, 17 Defendants.

20 On February 23, 2025, Michael Harrison filed a Co mplaint against Bloom Floral Design, a 21 business entity; Bloom So Cal, a business entity; Harber Enterprises LLC, a limited liability 22 company, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out of an alleged violation of the 23 Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; (2) a claim for damages 24 pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3) 25 a claim for damages for negligence. ECF No. 1. The Complaint alleges that this Court has 26 jurisdiction over the…