Conanan

(PC) Hisle v. Conanan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20251:21-cv-01680California476 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 DENNIS C. HISLE, No. 1:21-cv-01680-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

v. (ECF No. 57) MARLYN CONANAN,

Defendant. 13 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s demand for a jury trial, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 38. (ECF No. 57.) Consistent with Plaintiff's request, claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are triable by jury. City of Monterey v. Del Monte Dunes at Monterey, Ltd., 526 U.S. 687, 709 (1999); Fed. R. Civ. P. 38(a). Accordingly, unless the parties later stipulate to a court trial, this action shall remain a jury action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 39(a). The jury trial will be presided over by a District Judge, unless all parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a Magistrate Judge. To this end, the Fresno Division of the Eastern District of California has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.