Newsome

Smith v. Newsome

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20251:24-cv-00592California4,481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHANAEL SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-00592-KES-BAM Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND

v. (Doc. 7) GAVIN NEWSOME, et al., Defendants. 16 On May 17, 2024, Plaintiff Nathanael Smith, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed his complaint against Defendants Gavin Newsome, Kevin Seibert, Hallie Campbell, David Beyersdorf, Philip Pimentel, Anaiah Kirk, Ryan Campbell, Martin Huberty, Terry Woodrow, Frank Axe, Gary Tofanelli, Jeff Brown, Veronica Roberts, Cassandra Jenecke, Nate Nutting, Clint Parish, Oscar Martinez, Diego Martinez, Natalia Monaco, Stacy Spring, Sharon Sanders, California Highway Patrol, Central Sierra Child Support Agency, Olivia Phillips, and July Salkeld for alleged violations of his rights under the First, Second, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments and other federal statutes. (Doc. 1.) The Court granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and advised…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.