(HC) Rivera-Jimenez v. Warden at FCI Mendota

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20251:24-cv-01535California457 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISAAC RIVERA-JIMENEZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-01535 JLT SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DISREGARDING PETITIONER’S

UNTIMELY OBJECTIONS

v. (Doc. 12) WARDEN, FCI MENDOTA, Respondent. 16 On February 13, 2025, the magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations, recommending the Court dismiss the petition for failure to state a cognizable claim for habeas relief. (Doc. 9.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Petitioner and notified him that any objections were due within 21 days. (Id. at 4.) The Court also advised Petitioner the failure to file timely objections may result in the waiver of rights. (Id. at 5, citing Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 2014).) On March 18, 2025, the Court performed a de novo review of the matter, dismissed the petition, and entered judgment. (Docs. 10, 11.) After the Court entered judgment—33 days after the date of service of the Findings and Recommendations—the Court received objections…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.