(SS) Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20251:24-cv-01565California462 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLA JACKSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-01565-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

v. SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR

FAILURE TO FILE OPENING BRIEF

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

FIVE DAY DEADLINE

Defendant.

15 On December 19, 2024, Plaintiff Carla Jackson filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying an application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1.) On December 20, 2024, the Court issued a scheduling order. (ECF No. 5.) Pursuant to the scheduling order, Plaintiff’s opening brief was due 30 days after the filing of the administrative record. (Id. at 2.) The administrative record was lodged on February 18, 2025 (ECF No. 11); thus, Plaintiff’s opening brief was due by March 20, 2025. However, neither an opening brief nor request for extension of time have been submitted. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.