(SS) Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20251:24-cv-01565California462 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CARLA JACKSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-01565-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS
v. SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR
FAILURE TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
FIVE DAY DEADLINE
Defendant.
15 On December 19, 2024, Plaintiff Carla Jackson filed this action seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying an application for disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. (ECF No. 1.) On December 20, 2024, the Court issued a scheduling order. (ECF No. 5.) Pursuant to the scheduling order, Plaintiff’s opening brief was due 30 days after the filing of the administrative record. (Id. at 2.) The administrative record was lodged on February 18, 2025 (ECF No. 11); thus, Plaintiff’s opening brief was due by March 20, 2025. However, neither an opening brief nor request for extension of time have been submitted. …