Unknown

(HC) Silva v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20252:24-cv-00618California450 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOE SILVA, No. 2:24-cv-0618 DJC AC P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS UNKNOWN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a habeas corpus petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 16, 2024, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. On February 11, 2025, petitioner was ordered to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the pending motion within twenty-one days. ECF No. 21. In the same order, petitioner was informed that failure to file an opposition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The twenty-one-day period has now expired, and petitioner has not filed a response to the motion to dismiss or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In recommending this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute, the court has 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.