Kiss

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDALL POPE, No. 2:24-cv-0325 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

L. KISS, Defendants. 16 By order filed February 4, 2025, the complaint was screened and found to not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was given thirty days to file an amended complaint and cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 5. Thirty days have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. The file further reflects that the screening order, which was served on plaintiff’s address of record, was returned by the postal service. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address…