Vaughn

(PC) Plunkett v. Vaughn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 21, 20252:24-cv-01936California798 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES PLUNKETT, No. 2:24-cv-1936 DAD CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER W. VAUGHN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 19, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint. The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1),(2). After conducting the required screening, the court finds that plaintiff may proceed on claims for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.