Tyler Harris v. Max Fantuzzi
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
TYLER HARRIS, Case No. 2:25-cv-00259-CDS-NJK Plaintiff(s),
ORDER
v.
MAX FANTOZZI, Defendant(s). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Docket No. 1. On February 7, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed on venue grounds, or transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Docket No. 3. Plaintiff filed a response. Docket No. 4.1 The federal venue statute requires that a civil action be brought in (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants reside in the same state where the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant is subject to personal jurisdiction at the time the action is commenced, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought. …