Orcutt

Filed 3/24/25 Orcutt v. Vice CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

RICHARD V. ORCUTT, 2d Civ. No. B335120 (Super. Ct. No. 21CV-0030) Plaintiff and Appellant, (San Luis Obispo County)

v.

NATHANIEL VICE,

Defendant and Respondent.

Richard Orcutt sued Nathaniel Vice for intentional infliction of emotional distress, alleging he was responsible for sending threatening cards to implicate Orcutt in a crime. Orcutt appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment against him. We affirm.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Anonymous cards were mailed to four real estate agents, complaining about racial minorities living on Cavalier Lane in San Luis Obispo. The return address was given as “Cavalier Neighbors.”…