In re B.T. CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant and appellant, P.F.-B., the maternal grandmother (MGM) of B.T. and
Bo.T., appeals the juvenile court’s order removing the children from her care. We find no
error and affirm.
II.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The children came to the attention of plaintiff and respondent, the San Bernardino
County Child and Family Services (CFS) in December 2021, due to concerns about
domestic violence between the parents (who are not parties to this appeal). MGM told an
investigating social worker that, although the parents argued and had “normal
relationship issues,” she had “never been concerned about domestic violence” between
the parents. The social worker had learned, however, that a police report stated that
MGM called the police in May 2020 due to a domestic violence incident between the
parents, but MGM denied that she ever called the police. MGM also denied knowing
who the biological father of the children was.
CFS ruled out MGM for placement of the children “due to her lack of protective
capacity for the children and her deception” of CFS. CFS did not believe MGM’s
statements that the parents had not engaged in domestic violence, she had…