Paylocity Corporation v. Cangrade, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20253:23-cv-06349California2,847 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PAYLOCITY CORPORATION, Case No. 23-cv-06349-AMO

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE

TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

SYNOPSYS, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 52, 78 Defendant.

12 This is a trade secret and breach of contract case. Before the Court is Defendant Synopsys, Inc.’s (“Synopsys”) motion to dismiss (ECF 52), which was heard before this Court on May 8, 2024, and Plaintiff Paylocity Corporation’s (“Paylocity”) motion for leave to file an amended complaint (ECF 78), which is suitable for determination without further oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Synopsys’s motion to dismiss and DENIES Paylocity’s motion for leave to file its proposed amended complaint, for the following reasons. I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This Order assumes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.