Barfield

Barfield v. Doe

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20253:24-cv-00630California4,547 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:24-cv-0630-AJB-SBC

ROBERT BARFIELD,

ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION

Plaintiff, TO PROCEED IN FORMA v. PAUPERIS [ECF No. 2] 14 (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT KELLY MARTINEZ, Sheriff, JOHN WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

DOES 1–100, FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

PURUSANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ Defendants. 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A(b) 18 19 20 21 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Robert Barfield (“Plaintiff” or “Barfield”), an inmate currently confined at High Desert State Prison in Nevada, is proceeding pro se with a civil action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court dismissed Plaintiff’s original complaint for failure to state a claim and granted him leave to amend. ECF No. 3. Barfield has now filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) and a Motion for Appointment of Counsel. ECF Nos. 6, 7. In his FAC,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.