Bennett

Bennett v. Kaiser Permanente Southern California Employees Pension Plan Supplement to the Kaiser Permanente Retirement Plan for Southern California Permanente Medical Group

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20254:24-cv-00215California2,793 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ERROL BENNETT, Case No. 24-cv-00215-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 20 KAISER PERMANENTE SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA EMPLOYEES PENSION

PLAN SUPPLEMENT TO THE KAISER

PERMANENTE RETIREMENT PLAN

FOR SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 20. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND1 The underlying facts are largely undisputed. Sharon Walker was a longtime employee of Southern California Permanente Medical Group (“SCPMG”). See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”) at ¶ 6. She was placed on leave in July 2015 due to plasma cell leukemia. See id. Her leave was approved through October 2016. See id. at ¶ 7. Beginning in September 2015, Sharon’s brother, 23…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.