Roberts
Roberts v. Studio 15
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TINA LOUISE ROBERTS, Case No.: 24-CV-1329 JLS (SBC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER:
v. (1) DISMISSING FIRST AMENDED STUDIO 15, et al.,
COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO
Defendants. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) WITH LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 8); AND
(2) DENYING WITHOUT
PREJUDICE MOTION TO APPOINT
18 COUNSEL (ECF No. 10) 19
Presently before the Court are pro se Plaintiff Tina Louise Roberts’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC,” ECF No. 8) and renewed Motion for Appointment of Counsel (“Counsel Mot.,” ECF No. 10). As Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis (“IFP”), the FAC is subject to mandatory screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Having carefully considered Plaintiff’s submissions and the law, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s FAC, and DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Counsel Motion. / / / BACKGROUND On July 29, 2024, Plaintiff filed a…