Dickens

Dickens v. Franklin Credit Management Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20253:24-cv-01379California436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 LAWRENCE E. DICKENS, Case No.: 24-cv-01379-CAB-KSC

Plaintiff, Order Granting Summary Judgment v. [Doc. No. 19] FRANKLIN CREDIT MGMT CORP., et

al., 12 Defendants.

14 On March 3, 2025, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a brief showing why this case must not be dismissed in light of Plaintiff’s modification of the lien in dispute. That brief was due on May 18, 2025. Plaintiff never filed a response to the Court’s order. The Court converts Defendants’ motion to dismiss, [Doc. No. 19], to a summary judgment motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56. See United States v. Ritchie, 342 F.3d 903, 907 (9th Cir. 2003). Defendants have supplied convincing summary judgment evidence, supported by affidavit, that the Plaintiff has ratified the validity of the disputed lien with a modification executed on January 2, 2025. [Doc. No. 22-1 at 3.] Moreover, Plaintiff has already made a payment pursuant to that modification. [Doc. No. 22-2 at 4.] Plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.