Newsome

Smith v. Newsome

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20251:24-cv-00592California1,223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NATHANAEL SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-00592-KES-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

v. STAY LOWER COURT ORDERS GAVIN NEWSOME, et al., (Doc. 6) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Nathanael Smith is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action, alleging violations of his rights under the First, Second, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments and other federal statutes. (See Doc. 7 at 1-12.) On March 21, 2025, the Court screened Plaintiff’s first amended complaint and found that it failed to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. (Doc. 11.) The Court further noted that it did not have jurisdiction to review orders issued in state court proceedings. (Id.) The Court has granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days. (Id.) Following his original complaint, Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.