Stanely E. Redick III v. County of Tuolumne

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20252:25-cv-02530California674 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

WESTERN DIVISION

STANLEY E. REDICK, III, Case No. 2:25-cv-02530-ODW-BFM Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE:

v. TRANSFER VENUE TO

EASTERN DISTRICT OF

COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE, et al., CALIFORNIA Defendant.

18 On March 21, 2025, Plaintiff Stanley E. Redick III filed a civil rights complaint in this District. (ECF 1.) In a declaration attached to the Complaint, Plaintiff states that he was wrongfully arrested for theft, and that the charges were ultimately dismissed. (ECF 2 at 2.) Plaintiff claims that the judge assigned to the case, Tuolumne County Superior Court Judge Siebert, acted improperly. (ECF 2 at 2.) He alleges judicial and prosecutorial misconduct. (ECF 1 at 3.) Plaintiff names as Defendants Tuolumne County; Judge Siebert; and Judge Laura Krieg, who prosecuted Plaintiff and is now a sitting superior court judge in Tuolumne County. (ECF 1 at 2.) Tuolumne County is in the Eastern District 28 1 The federal venue statute requires that a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.