Hazari

Hazari v. County of Santa Clara

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20255:19-cv-04392California895 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 CYRUS HAZARI, Case No. 19-cv-04392-BLF

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION TO SET ASIDE ORDER AND

RE-INSTATE THE STAY

COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, et al., [Re: ECF No. 89, 91] Defendants.

12 On March 10, 2025, the Court denied Pro Se Plaintiff Cyrus Hazari’s (“Plaintiff”) Administrative Motion for Relief by Accommodation for Disabilities. ECF 87. On March 20, 2025, Plaintiff filed a first Motion to Set Aside the Court’s Order on March 10, 2025. ECF 89. On March 21, 2025, the Court notified Plaintiff that there was a filing error and directed Plaintiff to refile his motion. On March 23, 2025, Plaintiff refiled his Motion to Set Aside the Court’s Order on March 10, 2025. Compare ECF 89 with ECF 91. The Court construes Plaintiff’s motion as a motion seeking reconsideration of the Court’s Order on March 10, 2025. See ECF 89; ECF 91. After considering Plaintiff’s paper…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.