Campbell

(PC) Harper v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20251:24-cv-01549California682 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL HARPER, Case No. 1:24-cv-1549 JLT EPG (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATIONS TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, AND

TAMMY CAMPBELL, et al., DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE

FILING FEE WITHIN 30 DAYS

Defendants. (Docs. 2, 8, 10, 12) 16 Daniel Harper seeks to proceed in forma pauperis in this action, in which he alleges the defendants violated his civil rights while housed at Corcoran State Prison. (Docs. 1, 2.) Plaintiff requests to proceed in forma pauperis in this action. The magistrate judge identified four actions that qualified as strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Doc. 8 at 2.) In addition, the magistrate judge found Plaintiff’s “allegations are insufficient to show that there is a real and imminent threat to Plaintiff’s personal safety,” because Plaintiff alleges only that “he was not sent the appeal responses in time, violating California Code…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.