(PS) Barnett v. CA DMV

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERTA BARNETT, No. 2:17-cv-1517-TLN-CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(19). On February 27, 2025, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 81.) By order minute order issued on March 10, 2025, the magistrate ordered that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed by March 13, 2025. (ECF No. 83.) Plaintiff filed timely objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 84.) Defendant filed a response. (ECF No. 86.) The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de…