Ericson

(PC) Coffer v. Ericson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20252:23-cv-02474California420 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN CHRISTOPHER COFFER, No. 2:23-cv-2474 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ERICSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 6, 2025, the court screened the first amended complaint and found that plaintiff’s allegations against defendants Saltz, Costa, Edwards, Ericsson, and Prasad stated claims while his claims against defendants Grigsby, Doe defendants, and CDCR were insufficient. ECF No. 51 at 5-6. Plaintiff was given the option of amending the complaint or proceeding immediately on his cognizable claims against defendants Saltz, Costa, Edwards, Ericsson, and Prasad. Id. at 6. He was further advised that if he failed to notify the court how he wanted to proceed, the court would assume that he was choosing to proceed on the complaint as screened and recommend dismissal without prejudice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.