Ramos

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OSCAR RAMOS, Case No. 2:24-cv-0531-DJC-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER ANGELICA BARRON, Defendants. 16 17 This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local 18 Rule 302(c)(19) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff’s motion for entry of default 19 judgment was heard before the assigned Magistrate Judge on August 29, 2024. 20 On January 28, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and 21 recommendations herein which contained notice to the parties that any objections to 22 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No 23 objections were filed. 24 The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United 25 States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The Magistrate Judge’s conclusions of law 26 are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) 27 (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the 28 district court and [the…