(SS) Taylor v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20252:24-cv-00759California2,146 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PHILLIP TAYLOR, Case No. 2:24-cv-0759-JDP (SS) Plaintiff, v. ORDER LELAND DUDEK, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff challenges the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Both parties have moved for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 12 & 14. For the reasons discussed below, the court grants plaintiff’s motion, denies the Commissioner’s, and remands for further proceedings. Standard of Review An Administrative Law Judge’s (“ALJ”) decision denying an application for disability benefits will be upheld if it is supported by substantial evidence in the record and if the correct legal standards have been applied. Stout v. Comm’r, Soc. Sec. Admin., 454 F.3d 1050, 1052 (9th Cir. 2006). “‘Substantial evidence’ means more than a mere scintilla, but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.