(PC) Kutterer v. Well Path

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20252:24-cv-03385California1,965 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCUS KUTTERER, No. 2:24-cv-3385 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

WELLPATH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding pro se. Plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On January 6, 2025, plaintiff requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Plaintiff is required to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a), 1915(b)(1). By this order, plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing fee in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). By separate order, the Court will direct the appropriate agency to collect the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.